Pseudo-rationalizability over Infinite Choice Spaces
نویسنده
چکیده
A dominant concern in rational choice theory is rationalizability of choice functions. Rationalizability demands that a choice function can be represented by a preference relation according to which the choice function selects for each decision problem those alternatives which are most preferred (or undominated by other alternatives). A less demanding notion demands that a choice function can be represented by a collection of preference relations according to which for each decision problem the choice function selects those alternatives which are best (or undominated) for at least one preference relation in the given collection. This notion, called pseudo-rationalizability, has been given special attention in social choice theory and by philosophers such as Hans Rott and Isaac Levi. The purpose of this article is to extend known representation results due to Aizerman and Malishevski [1] and Moulin [5]. In [1] and [5] it is assumed that the underlying set of all optionsX is finite and the domain of the choice function consists of all finite nonempty subsets of X . We extend these results, relaxing both assumptions. Summary of Present
منابع مشابه
Hierarchies of belief and interim rationalizability
In games with incomplete information, conventional hierarchies of belief are incomplete as descriptions of the players’ information for the purposes of determining a player’s behavior. We show by example that this is true for a variety of solution concepts. We then investigate what is essential about a player’s information to identify behavior. We specialize to two player games and the solution...
متن کاملPseudo-rationalizability and Tournament Solutions
The theory of choice has given us a full understanding of how rationality, formulated as the maximization of a fixed binary relation, is reflected in regularities exhibited by choices from a variable feasible set. In the literature on tournaments, solutions are often constructed to pick the maximal elements of a binary relation, but one that can vary with the feasible set. Thus, we would not ex...
متن کاملOn randomized rationality
In contrast to the traditional notion of rationalizability of stochastic choice which requires the preference relations to be strict, we propose a notion of rationalizability without requiring the preference relations to be strict. Our definition is based on the simple hypothesis of a two stage choice process: stage (i) a preference relation R is drawn according to a probability assignment; sta...
متن کاملA pseudo-differential calculus on non-standard symplectic space; Spectral and regularity results in modulation spaces
The usual Weyl calculus is intimately associated with the choice of the standard symplectic structure on [Formula: see text]. In this paper we will show that the replacement of this structure by an arbitrary symplectic structure leads to a pseudo-differential calculus of operators acting on functions or distributions defined, not on [Formula: see text] but rather on [Formula: see text]. These o...
متن کاملCommutative curvature operators over four-dimensional generalized symmetric spaces
Commutative properties of four-dimensional generalized symmetric pseudo-Riemannian manifolds were considered. Specially, in this paper, we studied Skew-Tsankov and Jacobi-Tsankov conditions in 4-dimensional pseudo-Riemannian generalized symmetric manifolds.
متن کامل